The first thought, when considering such a question, is “Well, where do
I start?
There are so many things I would like to change!”
However, when getting down to business, making a sort of a
shopping list, I discovered it was not so much a matter of making radical
changes, or overturning our old traditions, but rather, of improving what
we have, of profiting from the experience of other brethren, other
Lodges,
other Grand Lodges.
The symbols and moral teachings of Freemasonry are our
foundation stones, these cannot be removed without having the whole
edifice come tumbling down. The structure of Freemasonry, as well,
doesn’t have to change, that means, the pyramid of lodges, Grand
Lodges,
and the side degrees, Supreme Councils, Supreme Grand Royal Arch
Chapters, etc. What needs change, perhaps, and I’m not trying to be
dogmatic, is the way Freemasonry operates.
Let me give you an example. In America, most lodges regularly
work in the third degree. Of course, Entered Apprentices and Fellow
Crafts are excluded from those meetings. This is not a “landmark”, in
fact,
the universal practice abroad is to work regularly in the first degree,
raising the lodge only to confer a higher degree. Why this is different
in
America, doesn’t concern us. Some blame the scare after the Morgan
affair, it makes no difference why it happened. The fact is this is the
current practice. What is the result? A man is initiated, we tell him he
is
now a Mason, he undertakes some obligations as a Mason, yet, the next
time the lodge meets, he is left out. Perhaps not once, but several
times.
How does he feel, this newly initiated brother? Does he feel part of the
group? Does he feel welcome? Was he prepared for this kind of welcome?
This brother starts his Masonic life on the wrong foot. And correcting
this
problem is so easy. Some Grand Lodges have already taken steps,
allowing its lodges to work in any degree they wish. Should all Grand
Lodges take this simple step, that would erase a common cause of
disappointment and the loss of promising brethren.
Another example. Many lodges have the rule of approving every
expense, no matter how insignificant, in open lodge. Brethren, I’ll
tell you
a secret, there is a new invention called a “budget”. Well, it’s
not so new,
really. What do other lodges do? The open lodge approves a budget at the
beginning of the year, and then, through the year, all expenditure within
the framework of the budget has to be approved only by the Master and
the Treasurer. Maybe the Secretary as well. Think how much time will be
saved in lodge business. And how much more interesting the meetings may
become, without discussing why the electricity bill is so high.
Brethren, I travel a lot. I have visited lodges in many countries.
Everywhere, I have found that the most successful lodges are those that
hold interesting meetings. Coming to the lodge should be fun.
Think for a moment about our competition. There is television,
video, and now Internet, and of course, the old staples, bridge and
poker.
There are shopping malls, sports arenas, plays and movies, concerts and
galleries and night classes and ... oh yes, there is also a family,
don’t
forget, a wife, and the kids.
So take a man who comes home from work, or perhaps he still is
chained to his desk. When that man stops to consider how he will spend
the evening, there must be some darn good reasons to make him choose
the Lodge. And don’t tell me about loyalty, tradition, his father was a
Mason. This is the 21st century, or the end of the 20th - if you want to
be
punctilious. Life is fast, time is our most expensive commodity. And a
non-replaceable one. Each one of us tries to make the best use of every
waking hour.
So, how do we make our meetings interesting? There are many
ways, but the most important factor, the one key factor is this:
involvement. Be sure to make as many brethren as possible take active
part in the proceedings. If there is a ceremony, assign stand-ins for
every
officer. Have rehearsals with participation of as many brethren as you
can
get. Have three Directors of Ceremonies, six Deacons, let them practice
the ceremony, then, if one of the regular officers is sick, or engaged,
you’ll
have a replacement ready at hand.
Have lectures, by all means. Not only on the history of Freemasonry
or again an explanation of the Tracing Board. Brethren, when you have
heard that a few times, it takes a strong will to stay awake.
Particularly if
it’s simply a recitation of what’s written in the book.
Ask brethren to speak about their work, their profession, their
hobbies. Have panel discussions. That way you’ll involve several
brethren
at once. Subjects? Anything. The AIDS epidemic, the problem of drugs in
schools, mercy killings, police brutality, don’t be afraid of
discussing
controversial subjects. Just make sure the debate sticks to the rules of
order. Everybody addresses the Master, no interruptions are allowed,
every speaker as one five-minute period, and perhaps a three-minute reply
if warranted. Don’t let comments turn into another lecture.
Have frequent dinners with the ladies. Initiations are good
opportunities to have the wife of the new brother meet the other ladies.
Make the new member - and his wife -
feel honored, the star of the
evening. In my lodge we give the new brother, at the end of the
Initiation
ceremony, two pairs of white gloves, one for himself, and one for his
wife
or his mother, in fact, we tell him, to the woman he most respects. We
also
give him three red roses, for the wife. To show that the Lodge is not
going
to split the family, but rather to enlarge it. The new Mason becomes part
of this big, huge family of millions of Masons throughout the world.
If at the beginning Brethren are reluctant to speak up, to take part in
the debates, ask the brother who will deliver his paper at the next
meeting
to prepare it in advance, make copies, hand them out to two or three of
the
“inactive” brethren to read the paper and prepare a written comment
on it.
Praise, no matter how well intended, is not a comment. A comment should
increase our knowledge of the subject.
By the way, papers read in Lodge
should always be written. No improvisations, no ramblings based on a few
headings.
Once or twice a year, have some outing, a barbecue, or a week-end
in a resort out of town. A visit to some geographical or historical site.
Depends, of course, on where you live. In Israel we have plenty of
archeological sites. But you have good places to visit everywhere. You
know quite well all the interesting places you can visit on a Sunday.
Instead of going alone, go with a group of your brothers.
I have spoken about the lodge, because that’s the foundation. The
Grand Lodge exists by virtue of the individual lodges, not the other way
around. The Grand Lodge should act like the conductor of an orchestra.
He doesn’t play all the instruments. He directs, he does not impose on
a
soloist his opinion of how he should play. Grand Lodge should give the
greatest latitude to the lodges, to develop in their own way. A lodge
wants
to meet every week? Let it. Wants to work only once every two months?
That’s also OK. As long as the lodge really works, as long as the
brethren
are active. As long as the lodge grows and develops.
Tradition. That’s a real stumbling block in many lodges, and also in
Grand Lodges. “We have always done it this way. Change? It won’t
work.”
Brethren, tradition should act as the helm, not the anchor. Take an
example. Tradition is that you cannot ask a man to become a Mason. No
sir, that’s a no-no. The ritual says so: “on your own free-will and
accord”,
or something like that. Why? Why shouldn’t you ask a friend, whom you
know would be a good element in the lodge, to come and join it? Of
course, if you are the boss, and you “invite” your subordinates to
join the
lodge, that’s another matter. That’s twisting arms. But telling about
the
lodge, describing its good points, the fun you have, the things you
learn,
the help you give, why not?
Better still, invite him to an open activity, such as a lecture around
the table, or a social gathering of the Lodge.
I have spoken a lot about the fun we should have in Lodge. But
Masonry is in fact a very serious subject. Ours is not a club, not a
Rotary
or Lions with aprons, not a charitable foundation.
We have a very serious
mission: to improve ourselves, and thereby
improve society. Wow, big words!
What do I mean by “improving yourself”?
Let me explain. All of us
have some preconceived ideas on many subjects. These are the product of
education, the family, life experience. Some of these ideas are
justified,
others are not. Some of our judgments are right, some are wrong. The
exchange of views in open lodge, in a friendly, non-censorious
environment, leads to reconsider some opinions. We learn to tolerate
views that run against ours. We learn to appreciate the variety of human
experience, of human characters. All this is part of what we call
“smoothing the rough stone”. This, my brethren, is Masonic work.
This brings me to another important point. I would like to see small
lodges, where brethren know each other, each other’s families,
professions, illnesses and happy events. A Mason who doesn’t come to
Lodge regularly is in fact an isolated Mason, and that’s unacceptable.
He
cannot perform his Masonic work by himself, he needs the give-and-take
with his brothers. In many rituals, the first words of the Master when
opening the lodges are: “Brethren assist me in opening the Lodge”.
Why
does he need the assistance of the brethren? Doesn’t he know how to
open
the lodge by himself? The point is, all the brethren in the Lodge, all
together, will be contributing to the Masonic work. And a lodge with over
a hundred members is too big to allow its members to do Masonic work
properly.
Charity. This has become a shibboleth, our single presentation card
to the outside world. Look how much money we give to charity! See all
these children’s hospitals! The funds allocated to fight this disease
or that.
I’m not saying this is bad, but it is not the purpose of Freemasonry.
Not
only there are many other voluntary organizations doing this kind of
work,
but the government - Big Brother - gives big money for these tasks. Our 3
million bucks a day we give to charity, are nothing compared to the cost
of
public health, or public education nation-wide.
So, should be stop doing our charitable work? By all means no, but
don’t make it our most important, or our only reason to exist. You want
to
help society, to make ours a better place to live? Why not giving more to
education? Poverty is the cause of many social ills, and it is
principally the
result of a lack of education, or faulty education, which is even worse.
I fear I’ll be running out of time, so let me touch on two subjects
that concern Freemasonry as a whole, two issues that will become more
crucial as the time passes. These issues are: first, the relations
between
Masonic bodies - recognition, jurisdiction, regularity. Second, the place
of
women in Freemasonry.
Do I see some eyebrows touching the hairline?
The whole issue of regularity was from the beginning fraught with
illogic. At present, confusion reigns. Grand Lodge A recognizes Grand
Lodge B, which is not recognized by Grand Lodge C. What happens to the
relations between Grand Lodges A and C? Elections take place in a Grand
Lodge. There are two candidates. The loser doesn’t accept the verdict
of
the ballot box, he claims hanky-panky. He and some of his supporters go
out and form a new Grand Lodge, claiming to be the true and genuine
successors of the Old Grand Lodge. They grab the keys to the Grand
Lodge building, and have police evict the other group.
All this is not theory, it has happened, more than once. Who is
right? How can we determine the truth of the accusations and counter
accusations? There is no higher tribunal to turn to in the Masonic world.
So we now have a number of countries with two - or more - Grand
Lodges, every one of them claiming to be regular in all respects.
Recognition between Grand Lodges, the right to visit lodges in other
jurisdictions, the right to affiliate, has become a mess. The so-called
principle of exclusive jurisdiction is in shambles. Some Grand Lodges
openly practice religious discrimination.
Some efforts are being made to have at least regular meetings of
Grand Masters. Your have this in the United States, there are also
similar
meetings in Latin-America, and World Meetings of Grand Masters have
been proposed, and have even started in a modest way, still not
encompassing the entire world of Freemasonry. Hopefully, this trend will
continue and develop further.
The issue of the place of women in Freemasonry I left to the end, so
I can run for cover if the need arises.
To start with, we have to recognize that there is feminine
Freemasonry. In other countries, there are Grand Lodges exclusively for
women. There is also co-Masonry, also known as Le Droit Humain, where
men and women sit together. For some Masons, these bodies are
anathema. Other Masons are of the opinion that each man or woman
should be free to choose the kind of Freemasonry he likes, and as long as
the basic purpose of Freemasonry - personal improvement leading to a
better society, is adhered to, we should find some accommodation with
them in order to work together towards our common goals.
One proposal submitted on the Internet is that Co-Masonic lodges
could be used as a neutral ground, where both brethren from all-men
lodges and sisters from all-women lodges could visit. Male members of a
co-Masonic lodge could visit mainstream lodges, while female members
could visit Feminine lodges. Thus, there could be contact between the
three streams of Freemasonry without making any mason - male or female
- uncomfortable by sitting with a person of the opposite sex.
This is one suggestion. Probably it will nave happen, but let us take
heed of the overwhelming movement towards equality between the sexes.
The time may come when we are forced to change our present regulations.
Would it not be wise to take preventive measures now?
Brethren, I would not want to leave you with the impression that all
in present Freemasonry is negative. Ours is an exciting, unique
organization, with long traditions, profound philosophical teachings, a
haven for right-thinking men in our present world, so torn by the ills of
poverty, war, terrorism, hunger and crime.
We must strive forth with enthusiasm, our spirit strengthened by the
knowledge that we still have much to teach society, and that we have the
tools to assist us in bringing to fruit our human potential.