Rivista di Massoneria - Revue de Franc-Maçonnerie - Revista de Masonerìa - Revista de Maçonaria |
---|
History Literature Music Art Architecture Documents Rituals Symbolism |
MASONIC PAPERSby W.Bro. YASHA BERESINERWINSTON CHURCHILL |
Great Men and Great Freemasons There are some great freemasons and there are some
great men who were freemasons. Winston Spencer-Churchill belonged to the latter
category. Justifiably our world-wide fraternity takes pride in
having men of stature as members: George Washington, Franklin D and Theodore Roosevelt,
Harry Truman, King George VI and Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh; Masonic
sportsmen Malcolm Campbell and Arnold Palmer; actors and composers: Clark Gable
and John Wayne, Beethoven, Mozart, Hayden and Sibelius and astronaut John Glenn,
jazz great Duke Ellington, even Casanova and Houdini, to mention just a few, all
freemasons. But have we at times attributed too much significance to their
Masonic association? Maybe more than they themselves have done?
Few would doubt the assertion that Winston Churchill
was the greatest British statesman of recent history. It was, as in so many
instances of fame, both personal talent and external circumstance that thrust
him into the very unique historic role he was to play as a politician and the
immortality he subsequently gained. In 1901 he became a freemason. What induced him to
join the fraternity? How active was he as a freemason? Why is it recorded that
he changed Lodges? Why did he resign? And most importantly, what part did
Freemasonry play in his life? Winston
Leonard Spencer-Churchill was born, two months prematurely, at Blenheim Palace,
Oxfordshire on 30th November 1874.
He was educated, as was his younger and only brother Jack and as befitted
children of the nobility, at Harrow School and, by his own admission, was far
from being a brilliant student. Reports of his education show him to have been
particularly weak in maths and the classics but excelling in the English
language – which was to serve him so well through his life. He always
regretted not pursuing his academic career, which, nonetheless, detracted very
little from his subsequent success as an author, an artist, a soldier, a
statesman and a family man. Edward Prince of Wales and Grand Master At the time of Winston Churchill’s Masonic
initiation into the Studholme Lodge No 1591 on 24 May of 1901, he was surrounded
by political and military colleagues to whom Freemasonry, in line with other
similar friendly and fellowship societies, was a fashionable social pursuit. All
the more so for having had the Prince of Wales, about to be crowned monarch,
Grand Master of the Fraternity. Prince Edward’s election as Grand Master in 1875 gave a huge impetus to Freemasonry. He was a great promoter
of the Craft and gladly fulfilled his Masonic duties in the public eye. He was
often involved in the ceremonial laying of foundation stones of buildings,
bridges, dockyards and churches. Freemasonry was being constantly publicised and
Freemasons were recognised and popular in their local communities. Edward was an immensely popular sovereign. He was a
jovial leader of society and that same society tolerated, even enjoyed, his
risqué behaviour as the Prince of Wales, indulging himself in food, drink,
gambling and women. He vindicated himself when he
succeeded to the throne in January 1901, resigning his Grand Mastership in the
same year, and throwing himself into the role of king with energy and
enthusiasm. Britain,
in this first decade of the 20th Century, was doing exceedingly well.
Notwithstanding the humiliations of the recent Boer War – in which the young
Winston had been an active and heroic participant – there was a general sense
of well being and security. King Edward, known as Edward the Peacemaker for his
diplomacy in Europe, was reigning over the largest empire the world had ever
known. There was a sparkle to the monarchy that had been absent for the best
part of 40 years. The well publicised and welcome Anglo-French Entente
Cordiale of 1904 has been credited to the king and his linguistic capacity.
The new Prime Minister, Arthur Balfour, elected in 1902 spent the next three
years ensuring educational reforms which saw a well educated middle class and
civil service enriched by qualified and educated staff. There was a general
atmosphere of invincibility in all fields of achievement ranging
from commerce and industry to military and political stability. Business was
prospering, entertainment and travel were at a peak. Kind Edward VII, as Prince of Wales, had been a
popular Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of Ancient Free and Accepted
Masons of England for a decade and a half. With him, a host of other Royals and
members of the nobility and aristocracy had joined the Craft. It was not by
accident that the promising young Winston was introduced expressly to the
Studholme Lodge number 1591 meeting at 33 Golden Square in central London. Studholme Lodge 1591 The Studholme Lodge, sponsored by the Weyside Lodge
number 1395, was warranted on 13 December 1875 and consecrated in Surbitton,
Surrey on 31 January 1876 by the Provincial Grand Master, R W Bro John Studholme
Brownrigg. It was his prominent family that gave its name to the new Lodge and
the family crest, consisting of a sword and serpent motif, is still in use today
as the design for the Lodge jewel. The list of members of the Lodge from 1876 to
1926, headed by the Master Captain A B Cook, shows an array of peers, baronets,
clergy, solicitors and barristers, service officers and many belonging to the
medical profession. In 1881 the Lodge moved to London and the quality of the
membership improved further. The summonses of the Lodge read like a Who’s
Who of the aristocracy and social elites. In 1886 the Worshipful Master was
the Lord Mayor of the City of London, Sir Reginald Hanson Bart and the table
plan for the 21st Installation Banquet in 1897 lists no less than 15
Members of Parliament, in addition to the Master, R H Walter Long. To his left
is seated the Lord Chancellor with large numbers of Lords, Earls, Sirs and other
titles, including Military Brethren of high rank ranging from Admiral Markham to
several Colonels dispersed throughout the dinning room. The Studholme Lodge takes pride in having had no less
that 17 Provincial Grand Masters elected from its members. Other prominent
Brethren have included HRH the Duke of Clarence, the first honorary and later
full member, the Earl of Yarborough, Lord Edward Stanley (later the 7th
Earl of Derby) private secretary to Lord Roberts, Sir
George Cave, 1st Viscount Cave, later to become Home Secretary,
Admiral Sir Reginald Hall, Lord Hugh Cecil, younger son of the Prime Minister,
Lord Salisbury and many more. These were Winston Churchill’s contemporaries on
24 May 1901 when he was initiated into freemasonry at the age of 27. Already a
keen and dedicated politician, Winston had taken his first seat in Parliament as
the Conservative member for Oldham just three months earlier. He was very junior
indeed in comparison to the stature of the Freemasons who had accepted him into
their midst. It explains why his name is not even mentioned as a member when W
Bro T W Wedding addressed the lodge with a brief history, on the occasion of its
50th anniversary in 1926. The lodge records give the date of his initiation, 24
May 1901 with his address as 105 Mount Street, his age, incorrectly, as 26 and
his occupation as a Member of Parliament. An insight into the scene on the day
is given by Charles Clive Bingham, Viscount Mersey in his autobiography
published by John Murray in London in 1941 A Picture of Life 1872-1940.
On page 188 he states ‘ ….that month I was initiated as a
freemason at Studholme Lodge (1591). While waiting for the ceremony I walked
round and round Golden Square with Winston Churchill, another candidate...’. Within
two months, on 19 July, Winston was passed to the second degree and on 5th
March 1902 he was made a full fledged Master Mason, all the three ceremonies
being conducted in the Studholme Lodge. His
raising on Tuesday 5th March was by special dispensation applied for
by the Secretary, Henry James Fitzroy, the Earl of Euston, Provincial Grand
Master for Northamptonshire and Huntingdonshire, and conducted by
the Master J C F Tower. At the same meeting Mr Ferdinand John St John was
initiated and the Brethren dined at the Café Royal, as was customary for the
lodge. An unfortunate communication in 1955 by the then
Librarian of the United Grand Lodge of England, Reginald Hewitt, to his
counterpart in Iowa, USA, has led to the erroneous reports in various
publications (including the notoriously unreliable 10,000 Freemasons and
John Hamill and Bob Gilbert’s Freemasonry A Celebration of the Craft)
that Churchill was either passed and/or raised in Rosemary Lodge No 2851. The
fact is that the Studholme Lodge register of members has the name above that of
Winston Churchill referring to one Geoffrey C Glyn and a further entry below
that of Churchill referring to a C C Bingham . Further along the line both of
these show the entry ‘Raised in No 2851 11th Nov 1901’. The
entry was wrongly attributed to Churchill and notwithstanding several published
corrections, the error continues to be perpetrated. In line with the general decline in Masonic
membership, the Studholme Lodge found itself with a reduced membership that
necessitated its amalgamation in 1959 with the United Lodge No 1629 to form the
United Studholme Lodge and amalgamated again in 1976 with the Alliance Lodge
number 1827 to attain its present status as the Studholme Alliance Lodge
retaining its original number 1591. Its popularity has not diminished and the
Lodge was honoured in 1978 when R W Bro the Rt Hon Lord Swansea, PGM for South
Wales, was elected and served as Master. Churchills who were Freemasons Winston will have undoubtedly been aware of the high
Masonic standing of his far removed ancestor Lord Henry John Spencer-Churchill
(b.1797 d.1840) the 4th son of the 5th Duke of
Marlborough. A Captain in the Royal Navy, Lord Henry was a member of the
household of his Royal Highness the Duke of Sussex at the time when the Duke was
serving as the first Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England. He died
prematurely in action, serving on the HMS Dolphin in Macao, on 2nd
June 1840. A large and well kept gravestone marks his burial in the rather small
and hidden away Protestant cemetery in Macau. In him we do indeed find a famous Freemason. A member
of the prestigious Lodge of Antiquity No 2, he reached the peak of his Masonic
career when, in 1835, the then Deputy Grand Master, the Earl of Durham was
appointed Ambassador to Russia and was compelled to resign his high Masonic
rank. R W Bro the Right Honourable Lord Henry John Spencer-Churchill, PSGW
(since 1832) was appointed in his stead for the remainder of the year and
continued in this office until 1839. By then he had served as President of the
Board of General Purposes in 1834 and was appointed Provincial Grand Master for
Oxfordshire on 2nd September 1836. He served his Province well and actively
until his untimely death in 1840. His name is now immortalised in the Churchill
Lodge No 702 (now number 478) which was founded in 1841 in his honour. It is only appropriate that Churchill’s father, Lord
Randolph Churchill (1849-1895) 3rd son of 7th duke of
Marlborough and his uncle, Randolph’s older brother, George Charles
Spencer-Churchill (1844 -1892) the 8th Duke of Marlborough, Marquis
Blanford, should both be initiated in the Churchill Lodge on the 9th
of February 1871. The two brothers were excluded from the Lodge on 22nd
January 1883 – together with some eleven additional Brethren, Oscar Wilde
amongst them – for non-payment of dues. They were subsequently reinstated as
they had been in South Africa on Her Majesty's Service, fighting at the battle
of Majub, which explanation sufficed for their re-instatement but not that of
several of their contemporaries. Some ten years later another member of the
Churchill family was to become a freemason in Oxford: Charles Richard John
Spencer-Churchill (1871–1934) 9th Duke of Marlborough and first
cousin of Winston Churchill was initiated on the 7th of
May 1894 aged 21 and remained active until his resignation in
March 1918. Resignation and Petitions As a freemason, Winston Churchill was following on
long standing family tradition but his overall activity during his life time is
well summarised in the words of the Grand Secretary between 1937 and 1957, Sir
Sydney A White ‘Winston
Churchill was initiated as a young
man but never progressed in the order and has taken no part for many years’. By 1912 Winston Churchill was well on his way to
political success and fame. In July of that year he was charged, as First Lord
of the Admiralty, to 'put the fleet into a state of instant and constant readiness for war, in case we
were attacked by Germany.'
Matters of consequence and importance were henceforth to absorb Winston
Churchill’s time, talent and energies. In the knowledge that he would no
longer be able to take any part whatsoever, he resigned from the Studholme Lodge
but continued his membership of the Craft. On a number of separate occasions, in
the coming years, his involvement in Masonic affairs was sought and he willingly
participated. A petition sponsored by the Royal Colonial Lodge No
3556, signed the 22nd of November 1917 and dated 4 January 1918 was
presented to the United Grand Lodge of England for the formation of a new Lodge
to be named ‘Ministry of Munitions Lodge’. With it, a letter
addressed to the Most Worshipful Grand Master and signed by the Master and
Wardens designate, stated the reasons for the need to found a lodge in
connection with the Ministry of Munitions. It stated that ‘members
stationed in London away from home..’ felt that following the end of the
war, Freemasons from the United Kingdom and the Colonies who had been brought
together in the Ministry of Munitions of War, felt the need to meet in a Masonic
environment. The letter also proposed ‘Armament Lodge’ as an
alternative name and finally pleaded to allow Sir Leonard W Llewelyn a newly
initiated Mason to be accepted as a petitioner, in view of his special rank and
standing. There were a total of 95 signatories on the petition and they included
Sir Laming Worthington-Evans, Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry and
Winston Churchill, Minister of
Munitions. His name, half way down the column in the third page, has an entry
under Lodge number ‘clearance certificate attached - Lodge
1591’ The
petition was refused by Grand Lodge on the grounds that ‘the policy of the
advisors of the Grand Master has always been to decline to recommend the
printing of a warrant for a new Lodge where it was intended that the membership
thereto be restricted to the members of any particular department of the Civil
Service of the crown’. The petition has a manuscript annotation on the
back ‘NOT RECOMMENDED’ it is signed P Colville Smith G.S and
stamp dated 11 Jan 1918. This was confirmed in a letter to the
petitioners dated 14th January 1918 addressed to Lieut. Alfred Lewis,
the Senior Warden designate and signed by the Grand Secretary V W Bro P Colville
Smith: ‘Dear Sir and Brother, The petition for the proposed Ministry of Munitions
Lodge has been carefully considered by those whose duty it is to advise the Most
Worshipful Grand Master on such matters, & I regret to have to inform you
that they are unable to advise HRH that the prayer thereof be acceded to.’ On 27th February 1918, the Master designate
W Bro E Allen, wrote a further explanatory letter in which he stated that the
Brethren had felt great regret that their prayer had not been granted and that
there may have been a possible misunderstanding and therefore gave a further
explanation, that it was not proposed to restrict membership of the Lodge
to the Ministry of Munitions or the Civil Service and that only the
signatories to the petition were resident in London. Bro Allen asked that the
Grand Secretary allow a deputation to meet with him and that the proposition,
duly amended, maybe reconsidered. This was the origin of the foundation of the new
Armament Lodge No 3898 - sponsored by the Royal Colonial Institute Lodge No 3556
– with 65 founders, the majority of whom were associated with the Ministry of
Munitions, and 25 joining members whose petition dated 30th October 1918 was
granted just three weeks later on 19th November 1918. Winston
Churchill, now no longer involved in the Ministry of Munitions, having been
appointed Secretary of State for War
and Air, was not one of the petitioners. This was not, however, the last of Churchill’s
involvement with petitions to Grand Lodge. During this period of tension and
patriotic fervour that followed the end of the First World War, Clementine
Churchill, Winston’s energetic and supportive wife, often visited munitions
factories through England. In early November 1917 she visited the Rees Roturbo
Manufacturing Company known as the Ponder’s End Shell Works, near Enfield in
North London and prompted by some of the workers she wrote to Churchill’s
Private Secretary, Eddie Marsh on 5th of November seeking Winston’s
assistance on their behalf. ‘The workmen of Ponder’s End Shell Work have
sent a petition to the Grand Lodge of the Freemasons asking that a local lodge
which they are starting may be called after Mr Brindley: they want it to be
called the ‘Bickerton Brindley Lodge’. The men are afraid that the Grand
Lodge may turn down the request as Mr Brindley is not apparently a very
important Freemason, and they asked me if it would be possible for Winston to
write a line to the Duke of Connaught, who is the Grand Master, to say that he
thinks Mr Brindley is a very suitable man and that it will give great pleasure
to the men he employs if the Lodge is given his name. The Grand Lodge meets on
Friday next when they think that the request will be considered. All the
Freemasons in the Works will of course be members of this Lodge. Please be very kind and see that Winston does this Yours affectionately Clemmie If you wan t more explanation do ring me up.’ Winston Churchill’s response and subsequent efforts
are quite extra ordinary. Within two days, on 7 November 1917, he wrote to the
Grand Master, the Duke of Connaught, as follows: ‘Sir I should be grateful if I might be allowed to call
Your Royal Highness’ attention to the request which I understand will come
before the meeting of the Grand Lodge on the Freemasons on Friday next, that a
local Lodge about to be inaugurated at the Ponder’s End Shell Works may be
named the Bickerton Brindley Lodge’ after the Manager of the Factory. Mr Brindley’s energy and ability have proved of the
highest value to the Ministry of Munitions, and he has succeeded in a remarkable
degree in enlisting the enthusiasm of the workers in the manufacture of shells.
If the proposed compliment could be allowed, it would be a source of much
gratification to them, and a valuable stimulus to the increase of their output. It is on these grounds that I venture to ask if Your
Royal Highness would feel able to advance the matter I am Sir Your Royal Highness’ most obedient servant Winston S Churchill He also took further and more important action to
support the Lodge’s application. Firstly he joined the petitioners for the new
Lodge, now to be named Ponders End Lodge (aware, no doubt, that a change
of name for the intended Lodge will have a far better chance of success). This
final petition for the new Lodge was submitted to Grand Lodge on 10 December
1917 and nominated and recommended Henry Samuel Bickerton Brindley, PM
2015 to be the first Master. The accompanying explanatory correspondence praises
Mr Brindley as Manager of the works. Winston Churchill’s name appears on the top of one
of the 4 pages of the petition and has the entry see attached slip in
brackets next to it. His profession is entered as Cabinet Minister one
step up from Member of Parliament. The attached slip referred to
is a personally signed typewritten letter accompanying the new petition dated 10
December 1917 addressed to the Most Worshipful Grand Master. The text begins: We, the undersigned, being regularly registered Master
Masons of the Lodge mentioned against our respective names………are desirous
of forming a new Lodge. The name ‘Brindley
Lodge’ has been erased and the name Ponders End Lodge has been
inserted instead in manuscript. The letter continues to recommend Brother
Brindley to be the first Master. This is still not the end of Churchill’s
efforts to promote the application of this particular lodge. After the petition was submitted he personally wrote
to J Colville Smith, the Grand Secretary, on Ministry of Munitions of War
letterhead as follows: My dear Sir, As I am much interested in the application which has
been made by the workers at Ponders End Shell Factory for permission to call
their Lodge the ‘Ponders End
Lodge of Freemasons’, I should be really obliged if you could let me know
whether it has been granted, Yours very faithfully Winston Churchill The hand written reply by the Grand Secretary will
have followed soon after receipt of Churchill’s letter. It is dated February
23 1918 it states: My dear Sir, The application for the proposed Ponders End Lodge
has recently been carefully considered by the advisers of the Grand Master, who
with great regret came to the decision that they were unable to recommend the
granting of the petition. Yours faithfully J Colville Smith G. Sec. Winston’s considerable efforts, beyond the call of
his immediate interest, can only be attributed to his eagerness to fulfil his
wife’s innocent request. How much more could he have done that write to the
Grand Master, join the petitioners, sign the covering letter and chase the Grand
Secretary for results! His efforts came to nothing. The petition had been
refused on 8 February 1918, 13 applicants of the 31 petitioners being members of
less than 3 years standing. The reason for the refusal is undoubtedly on grounds
similar to the original application of the Munitions Lodge. Was Churchill
peeved? Maybe frustrated and disconcerted by this refusal to his repeated,
almost formal, personal requests? Did he, as a result, have a pique against
freemasonry? There is no evidence to indicate any such emotions on the part of
Winston. There are many interesting implications in this
exchange of correspondence. The kind-hearted concerns of Clementine and her
influence on Winston. The naivety of Churchill’s approach to the Grand Master
and the presumption of effective political influence on Grand Lodge proceedings.
An element of naivety – or maybe just a perspective
of freemasonry in between the wars that we are unable to appreciate today – is
to be found in the context of Churchill’s only other recorded visit to a
Masonic Lodge. On 10 December 1928 Winston Churchill was the guest of the
Worshipful Master W H Bernau, who was Churchill’s insurance
broker, at the Royal
Naval Lodge No 59. He signed the attendance book – now on
display together with his apron and case, in the Library and Museum of
Freemasonry in London - indicating the Studholme Lodge, in brackets, as his
Lodge. The next day Bro Bernau wrote to Churchill at Chartwell, as follows: Dear Mr Churchill, I wish to thank you again for so kindly coming to the
dinner last night – I very much appreciate your giving up your evening in that
way and I only hope you were not bored stiff. Masonry might have as powerful an effect as the League
of Nations if it could be properly worked with a central meeting ground for
representations of all the Grand Lodges in the World Yours sincerely W H Bernau There is an annotation on the letter in Winston
Churchill’s handwriting addressed to his secretary, which curtly states: Eddie say I enjoyed it. This was not the end of Masonic Churchill’s Masonic
contacts. On 6 October 1943 W Bro E E Natty on behalf of ‘a number of Loyal
Freemasons residing in this City (Belfast)’ wrote to Winston Churchill ‘desirous
of forming a Lodge to be called . . . The Churchill Masonic Lodge’ and
requested his permission to do so. This
led to an internal exchange of memoranda between Churchill’s Private Secretary
Edward Marsh and his Personal Secretary Mrs R E K Hill. Edward Marsh effectively
instructed Mrs Hill to decline the request which is reflected in Mrs Hill’s
response to Mr E E Natty dated 9 October 1943: ‘….Mr Churchill would be
complimented by your request …. (and) would prefer that his name should not be
used in this way, since he is unable to take a personal part in the Lodge’s
activities.’ Conclusions What are the conclusions to be reached, then, of
Winston Churchill’s Masonic career? Clearly Winston, in becoming a freemason, complied
with the fashion of the time and his friends and colleague’s sociable
activities and wishes. He followed in a long-standing and distinguished
Churchill family tradition of freemasons. His respect, affection and the
influence exerted on him by his father Lord Randolph, will have played a part in
his joining the craft. No doubt, it
also fulfilled Winston’s own curios interest in the fraternity. He was a
joiner and freemasonry was only one area of his interest in similar
organisations. In November 1904 he accepted honorary membership in the Hawthorn
Lodge of the British Order of Ancient Free Gardeners, he is recorded as a member
of the Loyal Waterloo Lodge of the National Independent Order of Odd Fellows in,
Manchester in April of 1907 and of the Albion Lodge, Oxford of the Ancient Order
of Druids in September 1908. (his father, was also a member of the Woodstock
Lodge of Independent Order of
Foresters). Winston Churchill’s association with freemasonry must be placed
within this context of his membership, and almost certain equal inactivity, in
all these various organisations. To state that freemasonry will not have made an
impression on Churchill would be belittling the depth of our fraternity. On the
other hand to imply that his life or actions were in any way fundamentality
influenced by his having been a mason is unreasonable at best. There is not the
slightest indication to suggest that Freemasonry had any meaning for Churchill,
beyond a pleasant limited social activity. He joined when it was appropriate, he
resigned when it was equally appropriate and he was pleased to lend his name to
Masonic efforts within his own fields of responsibility. Had freemasonry had any
significance of consequence to Churchill we would have known about it. He was a
prolific author and has written extensively and in detail about his youth and
his life. So have umpteen other authors and biographers. Nowhere is there to be
found a mention of freemasonry in any context at all. These facts, however, detract little from the pride we
as freemasons derive in the knowledge that Winston Churchill was a freemason and
descended from a long line of active and distinguished Brethren of the Craft. Credits and Bibliography Current Secretary of the Churchill
Lodge Colin and his predecessor and lodge historian Bob Goode who composed the
History written on the occasion of the 150th Anniversary of the
Lodge. My grateful thanks are extended to Natalie
Adams, Archivist, Churchill Archives Centre, Churchill College, CAMBRIDGE, for
the helpful guidelines and leads and access to many source documents from the
Churchill Files and to John D
Forster, Education Officer at Blenheim Palace, Woodstock for his most impressive
and detailed off-the cuff information (duly verified) on Henry
John Spencer-Churchill. Also to the members of staff of the
Library and Museum of Freemasonry in Great Queen Street London and the Director
for the use of the Library and her somewhat reluctant assistance with primary
sources Did you know how hard is to be a masonic researcher ?
The following exchange of letters is self explanatory and published with the agreement of Mrs Clements and W.Bro Beresiner W.Bro. Bruno Gazzo Editor, Pietre-Stones Review of Freemasonry
MEMORANDUM
To: Mrs Diane Clements, Director The Library and Museum of Freemasonry From: Yasha Beresiner, PM Quatuor Coronati Lodge 2076 Ref: Primary Sources in the Library Date: 29 July 2002
Dear Diane,
I will start by saying how appreciative I am to you and your staff with all the assistance given me in the past weeks, lest what I am about to say should in any way be misinterpreted as a lack of gratitude on my part. It is not my wish in anyway to endanger the cordial relationship I have always enjoyed with the Library and Museum.
The reason for this letter is that I was most perturbed and frustrated by your not allowing me to view personally the Stadholme Lodge Register.
On Tuesday of last week, by virtue of my being a mere 'citizen of London' I was able to view, at the Corporation of London archives, the Charter granted to the City of London by William I in 1067. Last year at the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford, I held in my hands Elias Ashmole's Diary of 1646. This morning the British Museum have informed me that there is no document in their or their St Pancreas Library's vast archives, which is not accessible to view by any legitimate and registered researcher.
In contrast, the Library and Museum of Freemasonry is not allowing me - a recognised, professional author researching a commission for an article for the official United Grand Lodge of England publication - to view first hand the evidence I need from a document dated 1902!
There is something absurd and wrong here.
My intention is to verify the oft-stated error that Winston Churchill was raised in Rosemary Lodge. This error is attributed to a faulty entry in the above-mentioned Register. The error was most recently perpetrated in John Hamill's 'Freemasonry - A celebration of the Craft' (p. 229).
I feel I need not explain why I need to be able to look and see for myself primary sources. It is absolutely no consolation to me that, as you stated, 'Lord Northampton himself would be refused the same request'.
Furthermore, with the greatest respect I have for my colleagues Terry Haunch and John Hamill, it is simply not sufficient for you to tell me that they had both witnessed the error in question and that I would have to rely on their reports and, as you put it 'live with that'. Particularly in the light of the error mentioned in the above paragraph, which is very much a case in point.
To err is human and I would like to make my own errors. I am sure I am not alone.
You have been kind enough to allow me to publish the matters raised in this letter as your Library policy. In fairness to us both and future users of the Library, I would appreciate, when convenient, your formal written comments before I go ahead.
With kind regards,
Yasha Beresiner Past Master, Quatuor Coronati Lodge no 2076 (EC) Premier Lodge of Masonic Research -------------------------------------------
REPLY RECEIVED
From: Mrs Diane Clements, Director The Library and Museum of Freemasonry To: Yasha Beresiner, PM Quatuor Coronati Lodge 2076 Date: 29th July 2002
Dear Yasha,
Your letter of 29th July raised issues of considerable importance on which you have asked me to respond and I am pleased to do so.
I cannot comment in any detail on the examples you raised relating to other archives/libraries apart from noting that the age of a document is not necessarily relevant to the issue of access except where the Data Protection Act applies (with regard to maintaining the privacy of information about people who may still be alive) or where a similar sort of rule (e.g.70 or 100 years) is applied by a particular repository (including the Public Record Office) for reasons of sensitivity.
The other principal factor which needs to be taken into account when considered accessing is the physical condition of the document. Where a document is fragile or torn or otherwise damaged, use will inflict further damage and potentially lead to destruction unless the document is first conserved. As an alternative form of access "surrogate" copies of documents can be made available e.g. microfilm, facsimile or, increasingly, digital form.
I would now like to respond to your particular point regarding access to the "Studholme Lodge Register" or rather the register within the series for the period 1887 - 1909 which records the members of this lodge as well as members of other lodges. Each register in this series exists only in the single working copy compiled by Grand Lodge at the time.
The registers were used as current documents by Grand Lodge staff in earlier years but are now used primarily by Library and Museum staff to respond to requests for genealogical and other information (such as your own enquiry). The level of use of the registers both historically and today has meant that they are fragile and a higher incidence of handling could destroy the material completely, thus it is therefore not possible to allow greater access at this time.
The issue of access is one of which I and all the Library and Museum staff are conscious and one we are all working to address. Staff are involved with a number of measures now in hand which will significantly improve access to the collection as a whole:
- Computerisation of the Library catalogue (and the Museum) enabling key word searches and cross references across the library, museum and archive collections. (The basic Library catalogue should be available by Spring 2003).
- Cataloguing of the archives collections so that researchers can ascertain what information we have. (This is a much longer term project as, in most cases, there is no existing archive catalogue). - We have been awarded a grant by the Heritage Lottery Fund to catalogue and conserve historical correspondence from 1750 - 1815 (approximately 1700 letters) and the returns submitted by Antients and Moderns lodges during the same period. (This project is scheduled for completion by December 2003). - Digitisation of the membership registers from 1768 to 1886 which will be available for public access in CD form in the Library and Museum. (These volumes should be available by the end of 2002 and, if successful, we will then consider a similar project for later registers). - A conservation survey of the Library and Archive collections was undertaken in 2001 to enable us to plan and prioritise work on those documents and books most at risk. I appreciate that none of these measures will resolve your concern directly. However we have advised you that four or five previous and current members of staff have inspected the register in question and consider that the note re Rosemary Lodge did not relate to Churchill but to the adjacent entry. This was specifically checked again for you last Friday by an experienced member of staff who is familiar with the registers. As far as I am aware you have been able to view a considerable number of other original documents relating to Churchill as well as out biographical file on him where the issue of the entry relating to Rosemary Lodge is also covered.
I am looking forward to reading your work on Churchill when it is published.
Yours sincerely
Diane Clements Director |